NOTICE OF READINESS

Big Bow | www.seaphotos.net

I would therefore agree with the learned Judge in his rejection of the argument that the notice was a delayed-action device, effective to start the laytime automatically when, at a later date, the ship became ready to discharge the contractual cargo: and also the linked argument that time began when the charterers knew or ought to have known of the readiness.

Per Mustill LJ, in The Mexico I [1990] 1 Lloyd’s Rep. 507 at p.513

this page was last time updated on: 20-Jan-2012

Google Custom Search

 

Case Law

Balley v De Arroyave (1838) 7 Ad & El 919

Smith v Dart & Son (1884) 14 QBD 105

Akt Nordiska Lloyd v C Brownlie & Co (Hull) Ltd (1925) 30 Com Cas 307

Pteroti Compania Naviera S.A. v National Coal Board, [1958] 1 Lloyd’s Rep. 245; [1958] 1 Q.B. 469

The Massalia, [1960] 2 Lloyd’s Rep. 352

Compania de Naviera Nedelka Sa v Tradax Internactional Sa (The Tres Flores) [1973] 3 All ER 967

Shipping Developments Corp v V/O Sojuzneftexport (The Delian Spirit)[1972] 1 Q.B. 103

Galaxy Energy International Ltd v Novorossiyk Shipping Co (The Petr Schmidt) [1998] 2 Lloyd’s Rep 1

TA Shipping Ltd v Comet Shipping Ltd, (The Agamemnon) [1998] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 675

Flacker Shipping Ltd v Glencore Grain Ltd (The Happy Day) [2002] EWCA Civ 1068

AET Inc Ltd v Arcadia Petroleum Ltd (The Eagle Valencia) [2010] EWCA Civ 713

Voyage Charterparty

Notice Of Readiness


III. Premature and Invalid NOR
One thing is clear. In order for a notice of readiness to be good, the vessel must be ready at the time that the notice is given, and not at a time in the future. Readiness is a preliminary existing fact which must exist before you can give a notice of readiness; see per Atkin LJ in Akt Nordiska Lloyd v C Brownlie & Co (Hull) Ltd ((1925) 30 Com Cas 307 at 315).
Per Lord Denning, MR in Compania de Naviera Nedelka Sa v Tradax Internactional Sa (The Tres Flores) [1973] 3 All ER 967 at p.970

Apart of requirements that vessel shall be arrived, ready for loading and at the charterers’ disposal charterparty, often expressly provides for compliance with some specific conditions for notice of readiness to be valid. It can be required, for example, that the vessel has to be entered in the customs’ house before notice was given or free pratique has to be obtained or that the notice to be given within stipulated time window. In such cases the commencement of laytime begins only when the event stipulated in the charter occurs, the giving of the requisite valid notice and its validity depends on the conditions stipulated in the charterparty for its giving being met.

Alternatively, the parties are free to contract out any specific or standard requirements which, if not met, would have made notice of readiness invalid. The purpose of such fine-tuning is to relocate between the parties liabilities for delays in port, but extensive litigation on this subject demonstrate all the numerous problems of achieving an unambiguous result.

As general rule all modern charterparty forms, no matter a port or a berth one, allow tender of notice of readiness once the vessel has arrived at the port. From this point there are several ways of allocation of risks for delay, three most common mentioned below:

  1. In case of berth charter laytime starts to accrue if delay in getting into berth is caused by congestion, but NOR becomes valid only if retendered when alongside, ready for cargo operations and all additional requirements (if any) has been met;
  2. In case of port charter vessel tenders valid NOR on arrival at the port (anchorage) but laytime is interrupted for any delays caused by weather or navigational reasons;
  3. Special provisions in a berth charter may permit a notice sent from anchorage or waiting place to remain valid even if no any other notice was tendered when the vessel got into the berth.

Most dry-cargo forms adopt a variant of the first method, and most modern tanker forms the second.

Share this article on:

Leave your questions and comments here
:
:


Form by thesitewizard.com

Although author encourages visitors to leave their comments using this form, but should you be unable or unwilling to use it for any reason you can mail to info@lawandsea.net to contact with him.

Top of page